Uncensored AI for biology study groups
The questions that make a study group actually work
A study group is only as good as its questions. Any questions about chapter four produces silence; a good question produces an argument, and the argument is where the understanding gets built.
Why the mainstream APIs fail here
Groups dissolve when nobody prepared questions, and they stall when two members' notes disagree and there is no referee. General chatbots referee the easy disputes fine and fold to hedging exactly on the juicy ones, the disease and drugs questions everybody wants to argue about.
How Wild West API is used for this
Generate ten discussion questions per topic, ranked from safe to argument-starting. Use the model as referee when notes disagree: paste both versions, ask what the primary literature says. Assign each member different questions so the group has things to teach each other.
A working loop
- Ten questions generated, three chosen, argued properly; that is a session.
- Referee note disputes against the textbook, not against memory.
- Rotate who brings the questions so the group does not die with one person's schedule.
Details are on the privacy page. Per-model prices are on /models and the pricing model is on /pricing.