Uncensored AI for biology lab reports
Method, results, discussion: the skeleton in the order markers read it
Every lab report is the same document with different numbers: method in past tense, results with no interpretation, discussion that returns to the aim. Learn the shape once and every practical gets easier.
Why the mainstream APIs fail here
Students lose the marks in the same three places every time: interpretation leaking into results, methods written like a recipe for the reader instead of a record, and a discussion that summarises instead of answering the aim. Generic models produce the same three errors in cleaner prose.
How Wild West API is used for this
Give the model your raw results and the aim, and ask for the report skeleton with one paragraph per section and the sentences students usually get wrong. Then write it yourself and have it marked. The whole exchange costs a fraction of a cent on the cheap models.
A working loop
- Ask for the skeleton first, prose second.
- Keep interpretation out of results by pasting your results and asking if any sentence interprets.
- End the discussion on the aim sentence, restated with the answer.
Details are on the privacy page. Per-model prices are on /models and the pricing model is on /pricing.